|
||||||
|
||||||
JOB MARKET NEWSHedge funds hiring, but fussy11 July 2008By Sarah Butcher COMMENTSWe all know that half these lay-offs could of been prevented if "risk management" did their correct job! Read all comments »Anyone would think it’s easy to get into a hedge fund these days, particularly if you’re a trader. In the past week GLG partners hired two traders from Morgan Stanley and one from Goldman. CQS and Marshall Wace are also said to be scouting for disaffected banking talent (FT). Despite dire first half results (The Times), headhunters say the bottom hasn’t fallen out of hedge fund hiring. “There’s still work,” says David Durham, managing director of Durham Consulting. “I got a call this morning from a hedge fund looking for a whole pool of equity analysts.”
Traders in banks have ample incentives to make the move. With banks keen to rein in risk and Merrill, JPMorgan and Lehman all in danger of being downgraded (MarketWatch), they’re allegedly eager to work in an environment where their activities are less constrained.
“Trading limits are tighter, VaR is less and above all balance sheets are more restrictive than ever,” says Shaun Springer, chief exec of search firm Napier Scott. “If you’re a trader in a bank, there’s a lot less to play with.”
Banks are also encouraging top traders to branch out on their own and then investing in their funds. “They’ve had limits imposed on their trading activities and are supported by the bank which often wants to free up capital,” says the MD of a company helping hedge fund start-ups. Hedge fund roles remain off-limits for all but top performers, however.
Durham says the equity researchers he’s looking for need to be from the likes of Goldman or Morgan Stanley. Redundant bankers aren’t on the radar: “I met a portfolio manager who’d been in charge of a $7bn fund which is now worth zero. He asked if I could get him a job. I had to admit that it was unlikely.”
COMMENTSArsene Wenger, Risk Management, Fri 11 Jul 08$7bn fund to zero. That much of hurt! I have to say, there are a lot of talented traders out there being made redundant. It's a shame a lot of these banks won't be able to get their hands on these traders again. I mean why would you want to go a world where risk parameters are defined by idiotic managers who have no clue about risk and "10-sigma" events. We all know that half these lay-offs could of been prevented if "risk management" did their correct job! Add your comment »cristian_con, Fri 11 Jul 08Taleb nailed it in "Black Swan''. Talent is relative.
peter, Research, Sat 12 Jul 08What i don't understand is that they claim 2 hirings as evidence of `active recruitment'!!!! 2 out of how many thousand doesn't really seem like evidence. Add your comment »John, Trading, Sun 13 Jul 08Most trading managers aren't seasoned traders! When times were good any mug could just ride the markets and make money. As long as the money rolled in, those with fancy titles took the glory. Unemployment will rise considerably over the months and there will be many in the 'I used to be a master of the universe' category. Add your comment » |
||||||
| ||||||

