Hedge Fund Review
Career Center Jobs and Career Management in the Financial Markets, Banking & Finance Career Center
  Job Seekers Sign in / Register Recruiter's Sign-in

ADVICE

Guest comment: the legal approach to redundancy

COMMENTS

No employer likes to find out that you have taken legal action in your past and you will find yourself in the unenviable position of never getting beyond 2nd interview stage anywhere.  Read all comments »

Think you might be made redundant? Now's the time to start saving those emails, says employment lawyer Elaine Aarons.

Everyone in the City knows that economic woes lead to redundancies and the banking sector is being particularly hard hit in the current downturn.The latest figures from the Centre for Economics and Business Research suggest that up to 10,000 jobs could be lost in the City this year alone.

But in every round of redundancies, a significant percentage of employees are reluctant to just sign on the dotted line and accept their redundancy offer, especially if they feel their dismissal is unfair or unjustified.

First steps

If you are concerned about redundancy, the best precautionary measure you can take is to make careful notes of all conversations with your employer. It goes without saying that you should save all relevant e-mails or letters too. Amassing evidence is crucial.

This advice particularly applies to high achievers. Counter-intuitively, we are currently seeing some banks making their high fliers redundant. Speculation is that this way clients can be shared out amongst fewer players, thereby increasing profitability.

The first formal sign that you may be facing redundancy will be receiving an ‘at risk’ letter from your employer. Redundancy is not supposed to be a definite outcome on receiving such a letter, but it usually is.

In such correspondence, the employer typically explains that they are looking to deploy the ‘at risk’ employee to another department. As many banks have moved towards headcount freezes in the last few weeks, redeployment is not likely.

During and after a dismissal

Employers seem to be adhering more rigidly to proper dismissal procedures now, compared to during the last recession in the 1990s. It will thus be harder to bring a claim based on a procedural mistake, as fewer mistakes are being made.

However, this is not to say that unfair dismissals do not occur – employees are often made redundant in unfair or unjustified circumstances, even if the dismissal procedures are followed.

If you feel that you have been made redundant unfairly, you should ask to see the redundancy criteria that have been applied, and how individuals were selected for redundancy. Other than the counter-intuitive example of high fliers being made redundant cited above, we are seeing evidence of pregnant employees, or those returning from parental or sick leave, being made redundant. If you are made redundant in such circumstances, you may well have a claim for discrimination as well as unfair dismissal. Unfair dismissal claims are capped (currently at £63k). Discrimination claims, which are uncapped, can therefore be more valuable.

Making a claim

If you do feel that you have been unfairly made redundant, you should look into obtaining legal advice. It is likely that your claim will be settled by your employer, particularly if they are facing other similar claims. A good lawyer will be able to maximise the settlement you receive.

A word of warning though: steel yourself for a fight before making any claim. Whilst it is unlikely that your claim will go to a full employment tribunal, you are likely to have to go through either an appeal or grievance procedure, which is never pleasant. Allegations of underperformance are standard fare in the current climate and you will feel on the defensive when you want to be on the attack. You should be absolutely certain of your motives and objectives before seeking a legal solution, but there is no doubt that those who are tenacious do best.

Elaine Aarons is a partner in the employment team at international law firm Withers LLP. She specialises in acting for senior executives.

COMMENTS

Anon,  Thu 03 Apr 08

I understand John's comment. But it very much depends on the facts of the case. There are many good employers out there and people know certain groups of employees are always more vulnerable

Add your comment »

Undisclosed,  Thu 03 Apr 08

I disagree with John. Many individuals face real discrimination in the work place. It takes a few brave individuals to speak out and make a real change in working practices. For such individuals it is often not a case of suing because of the financial benefits, it is about improving standards for many other people who face the same discrimination at work. If no one is willing to fight nothing will ever improve

Add your comment »

Jane,  Thu 03 Apr 08

John, while I'd agree with your comments in general, it isn't always the case: we've pursued a very large global bank for misdemeanours for several years.  The last time we had to attend a High Court appearance and other half had to take half a day off work, his present employer actually wished him luck - and said that he respected the stand taken against dirty tricks and cheap corner-cutting.  He also said that the law is a lottery.  He was right - we lost, but it hasn't had an impact on other half's employment.  Decent employers realise that the City is full of dodgy characters and abysmal managers, and that sometimes you have to stand up for the truth.  Those who don't are, quite simply, not worth working for.

Add your comment »

Anonymous, Investment Banking / M & A,  Thu 03 Apr 08

I think John is being a bit harsh! It is totally irrelevant whether you took an employer to court, unless it was for some vexatious reason. Many people suffer real damage at the hands of their employers, due to bullying, discrimination etc. It can push many people into depression, consider suicide etc. Why should the victim be victimised further, when even people with convictions against them can find employment in banking (unless it is relevant to their position)

Add your comment »

MS,  Thu 03 Apr 08

Good to hear you are doing well Jane. I've heard so many people say if you complain about the bank you'll never work again. Quite often it is just to scare people into putting up with the status quo, however bad it is. I agree also that if no one speaks out, nothing will improve for other employees

Add your comment »

Helen Colquhoun, Compliance / Legal,  Thu 03 Apr 08

As a dual qualified (NY/UK) employment lawyer, my experience is that US banks can often ride roughshod over UK grievance and redundancy procedures, purely because similar statutory protections do not exist in the US and they are therefore blissfully unaware of them until it the deed is done.  US employers are constantly amazed to learn about the statutory procedures they are supposed to follow, and are all too used to simply being able to terminate employees on no notice, for no apparent reason and with no pay-off (unless of course there are express contractual protections to the contrary).

Add your comment »

Jane,  Thu 03 Apr 08

Dear MS, whoever you may be, thank you for your comment. Be assured that the battle will not be abandoned without a satisfactory result for the other half.  Too decent a bloke (which is why he was targeted) and too much a gentleman, they picked him because they thought he was 'easy meat'.  Well, he wasn't. We won't give up until we have absolute truth.  Banks perhaps need to realise that you don't make a person redundant.  You affect an entire family.  And some of us are mad, obsessive, determined and feisty characters.

Add your comment »

Anon, Investment Banking / M & A,  Thu 03 Apr 08

A very impressive list of anons... now why should I buck the trend.

Add your comment »

Undisclosed, Investment Banking / M & A,  Fri 04 Apr 08

I understand the challenges faced by multinationals, however, given many banks have a well established UK presence, with HR and Employee Relations professionals to support personnel management, there is no excuse for their "ignorance of the law”. It is quite concerning that when an employee approaches HR for support with enforcing their rights, HR will just deny liability. I was attacked at work by a senior member of my team, which was extremely distressing. A week later I found my employment terminated without pay, in contrast my attacker was supported by the bank because he was more senior. I was lucky that this bank had to disclose my Subject Access Request for technical reasons, which revealed serious evidence of bullying and discrimination going back some time before the attack. I think it is wrong for anyone to suggest I should be further discriminated against by prospective employers because I was attacked at work and had to complain about it. The UK Data Protection Act is in need of reform to ensure employers can’t just waive compliance in the majority of cases. Disclosure would allow employers to show they have followed a fair procedure in terminating staff

Add your comment »

Fiona,  Fri 04 Apr 08

I think the discussion here is very useful in raising awareness of the unfairness of employee dismissal procedures. A couple of years ago I found myself in an unfair dismissal situation and I stood my ground. Contrary to what John suggests I managed to move from a 2nd Tier to a Top Tier bank and have successfully rebuilt my career. I have kept the reason for my move private because there are still a lot of narrow minded people in the City, who don't face sexual or racial discrimination so may not realise how serious it is. I hope speaking out will stop people being intimidated by the notion that standing up for themselves will end their career in banking. I don't think anyone is suggesting people should engage in frivolous litigation, but if a bank treats you unfairly you have a right to complain. Without people willing to take a risk, banks will be able to continue getting away with non compliance with the law

Add your comment »
< Prev   1, 2, 3, 4, 5   Next >

ADD YOUR COMMENT

* Mandatory fields
Your name
Your field
Your Comment*
You have 1200 characters left
Image verification* ( What is this? )
Enter the code shown below or Sign in / Register to skip this step.
Disclaimer: All comments must adhere to eFinancialCareers Ltd’s Add your comment rules.
To complain about a comment, please email editor@efinancialcareers.com.
© Incisive Media Ltd. 2007
Incisive Media Limited, Haymarket House, 28-29 Haymarket, London SW1Y 4RX, is a company registered in the United Kingdom with company registration number 04038503